Setelah menjalankan blog ini selama beberapa hari, dan kebetulan baru ada waktu untuk melakukan beberapa testing di vps ini, maka berikut saya persembahkan hasilnya.
CPU Info
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 |
# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 62 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz stepping : 4 cpu MHz : 2100.002 cache size : 15360 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcn t aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor bogomips : 4200.00 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 62 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz stepping : 4 cpu MHz : 2100.002 cache size : 15360 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcn t aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor bogomips : 4200.00 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: |
Memory Info
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 |
# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 1031808 kB MemFree: 355800 kB Buffers: 164844 kB Cached: 405928 kB SwapCached: 60 kB Active: 411460 kB Inactive: 236724 kB Active(anon): 68500 kB Inactive(anon): 41860 kB Active(file): 342960 kB Inactive(file): 194864 kB Unevictable: 0 kB Mlocked: 0 kB HighTotal: 311304 kB HighFree: 3932 kB LowTotal: 720504 kB LowFree: 351868 kB SwapTotal: 524280 kB SwapFree: 524152 kB Dirty: 36 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 77428 kB Mapped: 30444 kB Shmem: 32948 kB Slab: 21224 kB SReclaimable: 17944 kB SUnreclaim: 3280 kB KernelStack: 560 kB PageTables: 1032 kB NFS_Unstable: 0 kB Bounce: 0 kB WritebackTmp: 0 kB CommitLimit: 1040184 kB Committed_AS: 316460 kB VmallocTotal: 122880 kB VmallocUsed: 972 kB VmallocChunk: 121580 kB HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 2048 kB DirectMap4k: 737272 kB DirectMap2M: 0 kB |
Test memakai freevps.sh
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2100.002 MHz Total amount of ram : 1007 MB Total amount of swap : 511 MB System uptime : 10 days, 2:40, Download speed from CacheFly: 27.4MB/s Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 9.51MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 9.77MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 318KB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 31.7MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 32.4MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.69MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.63MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 7.00MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.3MB/s I/O speed : 374 MB/s |
Inodes dan Disk Space
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
# df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 15728640 52344 15676296 1% / tmpfs 128976 3 128973 1% /lib/init/rw udev 126310 360 125950 1% /dev tmpfs 128976 4 128972 1% /dev/shm # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 119G 3.8G 109G 4% / tmpfs 504M 0 504M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 494M 24K 494M 1% /dev tmpfs 504M 4.0K 504M 1% /dev/shm |
Test download dari Cachefly
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin --2014-01-04 11:45:47-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 158.58.172.129 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|158.58.172.129|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.bin' 100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 101M/s in 1.0s 2014-01-04 11:45:48 (101 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600] |
Traceroute dan Ping ke Cachefly
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |
# traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 gateway245.prometeus.net (192.71.245.1) 0.672 ms 0.692 ms 0.672 ms 2 gw-cdlan-2.prometeus.cdlan.net (217.171.46.253) 0.346 ms 0.436 ms 0.509 ms 3 ibgp-gw-core-a.cdlan.net (217.171.32.129) 0.388 ms 0.515 ms 0.559 ms 4 seflow.mix-it.net (217.29.66.75) 0.854 ms 1.187 ms 1.545 ms 5 wf2.mi.sw-gw1.seflow.it (95.141.47.253) 2.356 ms 2.373 ms 2.410 ms 6 vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129) 0.305 ms 0.340 ms 0.263 ms # ping -c 10 cachefly.cachefly.net PING cachefly.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=1 ttl=60 time=0.320 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=2 ttl=60 time=0.430 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=3 ttl=60 time=0.380 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=4 ttl=60 time=0.366 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=5 ttl=60 time=0.370 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=6 ttl=60 time=0.383 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=7 ttl=60 time=0.358 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=8 ttl=60 time=0.384 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=9 ttl=60 time=0.361 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=10 ttl=60 time=0.393 ms --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.320/0.374/0.430/0.032 ms |
DD Test
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
# dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.10483 s, 510 MB/s # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.89101 s, 371 MB/s # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.97005 s, 362 MB/s ~# dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.4042 s, 315 MB/s # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 11.0995 s, 96.7 MB/s |
IOPING
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 |
# ioping . -c 5 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=1 time=94 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=2 time=227 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=3 time=196 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=4 time=188 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=5 time=260 us --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4.0 s, 5.2 k iops, 20.2 MiB/s min/avg/max/mdev = 94 us / 193 us / 260 us / 55 us # ioping . -R --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 35.2 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 12.4 k iops, 48.3 MiB/s min/avg/max/mdev = 53 us / 80 us / 28.8 ms / 157 us |
Test download dari Speedtest
Manstap Kang, terimakasih.
Kalau yg Dallas, 4 core @3.50GHz, i/o 631-800an
Itunya nodenya kecil, malahan pakai ssd lagi, jadi io nya laju. 🙂
Mantap sekali. 😀
Hehehe….
XenPower yang sekarang dipakai, kemarin beli yang di Italy, jadi masih terasa lambat kalau dari Indonesia. Harusnya kemarin nunggu launching node yang di US 😀
Mas Budi pakai yang mana?
Sama, belinya 31/12/2013 tapi nggak tahu ada promo baru yang di Dallas. Karena emelnya Prometeus nggak masuk sih. Tapi, yang di Milan storagenya lebih besar dan harganya lebih murah kok. 🙂
Prometeus emang ok lah 🙂
😀
aduh, ane jadi ngiler sama prometeus nih. apalagi banyak liat feedback positifnya yang luar biasa, semoga next project bisa di host di prometeus. 🙂
halo mas, kebetulan nyoba prometeus juga nih, tapi speedtestnya kok lemot ya
http://www.speedtest.net/result/3256071414.png
Dicoba lagi mas, kadang mungkin routingnya kurang bagus