Setelah menjalankan blog ini selama beberapa hari, dan kebetulan baru ada waktu untuk melakukan beberapa testing di vps ini, maka berikut saya persembahkan hasilnya.
CPU Info
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 |
# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 62 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz stepping : 4 cpu MHz : 2100.002 cache size : 15360 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcn t aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor bogomips : 4200.00 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 62 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz stepping : 4 cpu MHz : 2100.002 cache size : 15360 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcn t aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor bogomips : 4200.00 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: |
Memory Info
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 |
# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 1031808 kB MemFree: 355800 kB Buffers: 164844 kB Cached: 405928 kB SwapCached: 60 kB Active: 411460 kB Inactive: 236724 kB Active(anon): 68500 kB Inactive(anon): 41860 kB Active(file): 342960 kB Inactive(file): 194864 kB Unevictable: 0 kB Mlocked: 0 kB HighTotal: 311304 kB HighFree: 3932 kB LowTotal: 720504 kB LowFree: 351868 kB SwapTotal: 524280 kB SwapFree: 524152 kB Dirty: 36 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 77428 kB Mapped: 30444 kB Shmem: 32948 kB Slab: 21224 kB SReclaimable: 17944 kB SUnreclaim: 3280 kB KernelStack: 560 kB PageTables: 1032 kB NFS_Unstable: 0 kB Bounce: 0 kB WritebackTmp: 0 kB CommitLimit: 1040184 kB Committed_AS: 316460 kB VmallocTotal: 122880 kB VmallocUsed: 972 kB VmallocChunk: 121580 kB HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 2048 kB DirectMap4k: 737272 kB DirectMap2M: 0 kB |
Test memakai freevps.sh
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2100.002 MHz Total amount of ram : 1007 MB Total amount of swap : 511 MB System uptime : 10 days, 2:40, Download speed from CacheFly: 27.4MB/s Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 9.51MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 9.77MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 318KB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 31.7MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 32.4MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.69MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.63MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 7.00MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.3MB/s I/O speed : 374 MB/s |
Inodes dan Disk Space
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
# df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 15728640 52344 15676296 1% / tmpfs 128976 3 128973 1% /lib/init/rw udev 126310 360 125950 1% /dev tmpfs 128976 4 128972 1% /dev/shm # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 119G 3.8G 109G 4% / tmpfs 504M 0 504M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 494M 24K 494M 1% /dev tmpfs 504M 4.0K 504M 1% /dev/shm |
Test download dari Cachefly
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin --2014-01-04 11:45:47-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 158.58.172.129 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|158.58.172.129|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.bin' 100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 101M/s in 1.0s 2014-01-04 11:45:48 (101 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600] |
Traceroute dan Ping ke Cachefly
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |
# traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 gateway245.prometeus.net (192.71.245.1) 0.672 ms 0.692 ms 0.672 ms 2 gw-cdlan-2.prometeus.cdlan.net (217.171.46.253) 0.346 ms 0.436 ms 0.509 ms 3 ibgp-gw-core-a.cdlan.net (217.171.32.129) 0.388 ms 0.515 ms 0.559 ms 4 seflow.mix-it.net (217.29.66.75) 0.854 ms 1.187 ms 1.545 ms 5 wf2.mi.sw-gw1.seflow.it (95.141.47.253) 2.356 ms 2.373 ms 2.410 ms 6 vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129) 0.305 ms 0.340 ms 0.263 ms # ping -c 10 cachefly.cachefly.net PING cachefly.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=1 ttl=60 time=0.320 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=2 ttl=60 time=0.430 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=3 ttl=60 time=0.380 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=4 ttl=60 time=0.366 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=5 ttl=60 time=0.370 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=6 ttl=60 time=0.383 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=7 ttl=60 time=0.358 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=8 ttl=60 time=0.384 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=9 ttl=60 time=0.361 ms 64 bytes from vip1.mil1.cachefly.net (158.58.172.129): icmp_req=10 ttl=60 time=0.393 ms --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.320/0.374/0.430/0.032 ms |
DD Test
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
# dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.10483 s, 510 MB/s # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.89101 s, 371 MB/s # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.97005 s, 362 MB/s ~# dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.4042 s, 315 MB/s # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 11.0995 s, 96.7 MB/s |
IOPING
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 |
# ioping . -c 5 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=1 time=94 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=2 time=227 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=3 time=196 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=4 time=188 us 4.0 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=5 time=260 us --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 5 requests completed in 4.0 s, 5.2 k iops, 20.2 MiB/s min/avg/max/mdev = 94 us / 193 us / 260 us / 55 us # ioping . -R --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics --- 35.2 k requests completed in 3.0 s, 12.4 k iops, 48.3 MiB/s min/avg/max/mdev = 53 us / 80 us / 28.8 ms / 157 us |
Test download dari Speedtest
Manstap Kang, terimakasih.
Kalau yg Dallas, 4 core @3.50GHz, i/o 631-800an
Itunya nodenya kecil, malahan pakai ssd lagi, jadi io nya laju.
Mantap sekali.
Heheheβ¦.
XenPower yang sekarang dipakai, kemarin beli yang di Italy, jadi masih terasa lambat kalau dari Indonesia. Harusnya kemarin nunggu launching node yang di US
Mas Budi pakai yang mana?
Sama, belinya 31/12/2013 tapi nggak tahu ada promo baru yang di Dallas. Karena emelnya Prometeus nggak masuk sih. Tapi, yang di Milan storagenya lebih besar dan harganya lebih murah kok.
Prometeus emang ok lah
aduh, ane jadi ngiler sama prometeus nih. apalagi banyak liat feedback positifnya yang luar biasa, semoga next project bisa di host di prometeus.
halo mas, kebetulan nyoba prometeus juga nih, tapi speedtestnya kok lemot ya
http://www.speedtest.net/result/3256071414.png
Dicoba lagi mas, kadang mungkin routingnya kurang bagus